Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-7136061-20150504185207/@comment-7136061-20150512161706

Hiddenlich wrote: LeafosLog wrote: Okay, okay, I'll admit that previously I argued that as long as Weegeepedia had quality content then it was still alive but I left for a year, more spammers came, horrible 2-year-olds drew their own Weegees and the site is out of control. I say that Weegeepedia needs some serious cleanup.

I'd start with a method of quality control. Recolors and the like should always be accepted, since they're true to the spirit of Wegeepedia, but I believe that hand-drawn Weegees should have to not look ugly. Also, their articles shouldn't be horrible. I'll name 'Giraffeegee' as one. Ahem. I quote- "Giraffeegee is a giraffe Weegee that shoots lasers from his eyes and if you get hit then you turn into a giraffe." Yep, that's the whole article. Besides a horrible hand-drawn picture, that's it. We need some admins to patrol... the main problem being that spammers will delete pages if they pass an admin test. Any corrupt admins must be removed, unnecessary work for the real admins, etc, etc, etc.

Let me know what you think. You forget to mention how most of us have to rewrite pages that have horrible grammar. Oh yes... sorry about that. Yeah, some pages just make my eyes bleed. I tend to fix ones I come across but the edit buttons became way smaller when I switched to the Monobook layout.