Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25125832-20151114012010/@comment-25125832-20151114193841

Dudeguy WC wrote: Freegee wrote:

Dudeguy WC wrote:

Freegee wrote:

Dudeguy WC wrote:

Pickleodeon wrote: I have a question. What happens if the balance is upset by a flood of non-recolors? That depends on how bad the flood is. If we see a flood of horribly drawn non-recolors, we may have to do Plan Inverted Z. If it's just upset by a flood of top quality non-recolors (unlikely to happen, though), I'll be happy, but also remind people that they can always do more recolors if it's tiring (I always find it tiring when I draw for many hours). Are you ever going to implement non-recolor quality control? Stuff like this, this, this, this, and this should not be allowed. If a non-recolor is very poorly drawn, the creator should have 24 hours to make a V2 or it will get deleted. Uh, we did implement some control when the wiki was randomly flooded by stickmen and things with lines drawn on top of them.

And if we want to do non-recolor quality control to that extent (though I agree with the Dark AD one, scribblegees is another thing I'll talk about getting removed), we'd have to do some recolor quality control too. Though not as glaring, there are some recolors that are horribly recolored, and they should be updated or changed. All of the articles I listed are terrible, not just the Dark AD one. AD is the one making all these horrible NoPic characters and doodles. You should start banning people for making them, like you do for people who make recolors. Eh perhaps. If enough people complain for good reason then something will be done, even if it's not me doing it. Start a poll for non-recolor quality control. Also make a category for low-quality non-recolors.