Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-7202143-20160105135934/@comment-27447138-20160106211207

TheWeegeeThatWillFixYourHouse wrote: Dudegi WC wrote: TheWeegeeThatWillFixYourHouse wrote: Maybe I wouldn't have made a "retarted" rant if you guys didn't piss me off. I seriously doubt someone will get the cops to track my IP just because I recolored their stuff and they're butthurt about it. "If I steal a dollar from someone I doubt the cops will kill me" - What you basically said

It's not as bad as robbing a bank, but it's still wrong in the eyes of the law, and in the eyes of most people's morals. If you sincerely don't consider my quote as wrong, then ask yourself this: Would you be pissed if someone stole some cheap object from you? Probably.

It's not a matter of "they probably won't do this so it's ok." Yeah, if you shoot a guy to death, he's definitely not gonna fight back, but it's still wrong because HELLO IT'S KILLING.

Doesn't matter if they may not do anything because HELLO IT'S STEALING. Do you see the most simplistic way I could describe the pattern here? If you don't then there is no arguing with someone whose brain is on backwards because they slept wrong. I understand your point. But ever since the AMFA showed up you've had a negative as heck attitude towards recolors. And recoloring is sure as heck better as stealing someone's art, not editing it at all, and uploading it as their own. If someone did THAT to my art, I'd be pissed. But recoloring? They can recolor all my stuff for all I care. Then don't get mad at this NotPickleodeon.

And no, it hasn't been since the AMFA showed up. I literally wasn't aware recoloring was art theft (I know I was dumb) until Lich explained stuff to me, which happened to be in November I think.