Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-29943340-20180415013928

As a few of you know, I've been trying to make an effort to allow the pure source editor to be a good option for most users. However, I am curious as to what editors you guys generally use. There are 3 editors that users can use:

The default editor for new users, the VisualEditor loads an editor on top of the page, as opposed to loading a new one. Things like images and templates are displayed exactly as they would on the normal page. However, the VisualEditor is slow, clunky, and very hard to customize for a wiki's needs. It's also buggy, despite all the easy-to-understand features.
 * VisualEditor

This editor, aka the "Old Visual Editor", is what some users use. This editor loads on a separate page and also displays things as they would look on the actual page, though without the right rail and other contents. This one IS customizable for a wiki, loads quicker while still featuring MOST of the features of the VisualEditor, and one of the only big bugs will sometimes occur when switching between Visual and Source mode.
 * Classic "Rich Text" Editor

This editor is the bare basics. Users are only able to edit in wikitext, though the buttons from the Classic Editor are still retained. Very quick to load, no bugs, and thanks to the Template Presets menu, it's easy to add templates too. It's just not the friendliest with new users.
 * Source Editor

With that said, which editor do you guys currently use, and do you plan to switch or try others? At the moment, I've been encouraging people to use the Source Editor, since the other editors have bugs I can't fix at the moment. But, I know most people use other editors and I do want to know why.

And for the love of god actually pay attention to this I don't want like 2 replies and one of them is short meegee. 