Board Thread:Deletion/@comment-25125832-20151020224131/@comment-26077510-20151028073157

Garbled Red Text wrote: Freegee wrote:

Garbled Red Text wrote:

Freegee wrote:

Dudeguy WC wrote: For the most part, you do a good job at finding articles that need to be deleted. There are a few I will disagree with (nothing on this general list, just specifics), but for the most part, you're good at it.

Also yes, we'll have to change all the Angryfaicgee stuff or delete it (depending on where it is). I'm debating if we should just restore it (despite Nick wanting it all gone) since it'll be hard to find all of the pages mentioning him. Just restore it, it would be a nightmare to delete all the Angryfaicgee-related articles, because there is like eighty. I wouldn't say "eighty", but rather around twenty or so.

Although I can agree on the deletion of my older articles, I can't agree on the deletion of "WeeW" pages. The "WeeW" articles are horrible. All they are is one-sentence, ugly recolors of random characters.

EDIT: Finally, they were deleted. Soooo.... How does wooden texturization count as recoloring?

WTF HAPPENED TO YOUR SPRITE?!